In this week’s reading for Module 2 I found that there were
many topics that will make me a better, more compassionate teacher. One topic that was covered that will help me
become a more knowledgeable teacher is the section regarding individualized
education program. Since I do not work
in a school setting, I was unfamiliar with the topic of IEP’s. When IEP’s were mentioned in our previous class,
I was not able to contribute fully because I did not have firsthand knowledge. I feel that Woolfolk explained the IEP in detailed
stating that they are “an important educational and legal document” (p 143) “between
parents and the school about the services that will be provided to the student.
” (p 142) Woolfolk explains what must be
on the IEP’s, who is involved in the IEP, and the rights of the student and
family. After reading this section, and
the following about challenges students and teachers face I feel more knowledgeable
and better prepared to instill a growth mindset in my students and help them
get passed a learned helplessness.
Language development, language diversity, and immigrant
education caught my attention because I am a first generation American and can
relate to some of the challenges written in the text. Before reading the point/counterpoint about what
is the best way to teach students who are ELL’s, I always thought the best
approach is structured English immersion.
I felt this is the best option because I’ve seen friends and relatives
of all ages learn English and excel in school with the structured English
immersion approach. After one year of
this approach, they were able to speak and read English fluently and do well in
other subjects. Most of my friends and
family members also went to Polish school were they were able to keep up their native
language skills, but those classes were either on week nights or weekends. After reading the counterpoint that the
students’ native language should be maintained (dual-language instruction) I
feel torn between both methods. I do see
benefits of both methods, but with so many different languages in the United States,
I do not know if this method can be executed for all students. For this reason I feel that Woolfolk is
correct when stating “A combination of clarity of learning goals and direct
instruction in needed skills seem to be effective and includes learning
strategies and tactics, teacher or peer guided practice leading to independent
practice, authentic and engaging tasks, opportunities for interaction and
conversation that are academically focused, and warm encouragement from the teacher”
(p 203). One of my goals after becoming
an Elementary Education teacher would be to further my education and become an
ELL teacher. I feel that learning all
viewpoints will help me better relate to all my students.
Finally, I felt Chapter 8 was very enlightening because I
never understood how memory worked or connected to past knowledge and experiences. The tips on reaching all students with
Mnemonics to start, and the importance of “connecting to what the students
already know…and deep processing” (p331) will help me become a better
teacher.
Hi Renee,
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing! I agree that I find IEP's somewhat confusing because I do not work in a traditional school setting, but I agree that Woolfolk gave a one great insigh that helped me to better understand IEP's. I'm sure we will have a better understanding how IEP's work once we have some hands on experience. I, also, think with your experience as an ELL student will help you understand and reach your students' learning needs. Although you are torn between the dual language and English immersion, once you are in the classroom you will get a feeling for what is best for your student in learning English as a second language.